Understanding ZYTO Reports can help you make better decisions for the health and wellness of your clients.
Galvanic skin response (GSR) data is gathered from the ZYTO Hand Cradle. The software analyzes each response. Responses are gathered and displayed in reports. When paired with other tests and methods, these reports assist wellness professionals and their clients in making individualized wellness decisions.
The ZYTO Hand Cradle measures and records GSR data. The ZYTO software analyzes how these responses vary from the baseline to determine biological coherence.
When the parts and pieces of a system work in harmony with one another, we call this coherence. The greater a system’s coherence, oftentimes the greater its efficiency. Measuring this signal of cooperation, or the lack thereof, provides understanding about what may increase or decrease efficiency.
The ZYTO Hand Cradle measures and records GSR data. The ZYTO software analyzes how these responses vary from the baseline to determine biological coherence.
When the parts and pieces of a system work in harmony with one another, we call this coherence. The greater a system’s coherence, oftentimes the greater its efficiency. Measuring this signal of cooperation, or the lack thereof, provides understanding about what may increase or decrease efficiency.
ZYTO report data is used as one piece of the puzzle you are assembling on behalf of your client.
When making a differential diagnosis, more information helps practitioners through the process of investigation, comparison, and elimination.
Before running a ZYTO scan, consider what you already know about your client. This may guide your decisions about what to scan for and what responses you might expect.
ZYTO technology facilitates more comprehensive data gathering.
Look for clues
Clues will become obvious when you begin to look for patterns, relationships, and trends. Learning to ask effective questions about the data will help draw out these clues when integrating ZYTO reports into your findings.
Looking at the original dR values of the stressors or biomarkers, is there a stair-step effect? For example, in this report, the dR values of some Virtual Items are grouped around 80, the next most out-of-range group settled around 40, and a third group was around 20. These might represent a pattern of energetic priority.
How does the stressor dR compare to the range value? A dR of 60 compared to a range of 40 is less significant than a dR of 25 when the range value is 2.5. The further a stressor dR value is from the range, the more significant the stressor typically is for that person.
Looking at the original dR values of the stressors or biomarkers, is there a stair-step effect? For example, in this report, the dR values of some Virtual Items are grouped around 80, the next most out-of-range group settled around 40, and a third group was around 20. These might represent a pattern of energetic priority.
How does the stressor dR compare to the range value? A dR of 60 compared to a range of 40 is less significant than a dR of 25 when the range value is 2.5. The further a stressor dR value is from the range, the more significant the stressor typically is for that person.
